Skip to main content

Obesity Linked to Low Income [Duh]

So here I am sitting at the computer on Yahoo! the other day when I come across an article I found a little "interesting". It was more centralized to women, being one of those female-health online-magazine articles, but within the article, they argued with research that the results were consistent among men as well.

So while nothing about this interested me to the point of "oh, this is something new to learn", I was interested in reading what I was sure would be classic, boneheaded comments from people interviewed on the subject (economists, scientists, and doctors).

Among these putrid comments, stood one above all the rest. An economist had stated, "you would believe with all the money the high-income bracket obtains, they would be the ones more likely to suffer from obesity levels because they can afford more food." Clearly he's one of the high-income bracket members...

I wouldn't have to do research or study anything on this topic in order to tell you that I knew it to be fact that low-income = higher risk of obesity. It's pretty much uncommon sense to comprehend this fact.

You have to look no further than a McDonalds (there's one on every second or third corner of the United States if you were unaware of how to locate one, they will be marked with a big, bright yellow arch, or M in the front) to see the economic and scientific proof of this fact. The dollar menu, and meals, are loaded with fatty, processed foods which your arteries clog post-meal to prevent you from eating. Meanwhile, the "healthy, low-calorie" alternative meals sit among the most expensive products you can purchase at McDonalds. Now how/why is it that less work/preparation costs more? I don't have a specific answer to that question, and would hate to risk sounding like a conspiracy theorist against the man.

Perhaps the most infuriating thing about this study/find is that our nation's leader (not President Barack Obama, but the one who has him by the balls) is one of the most active fighters of obesity in our nation, and while these two laid out plans before the election, neither has adopted a real fight against obesity (financially). The way to fight off obesity, is obviously to eat less-fattening foods, smaller portions, and exercise. Affordability is not possible for low-income households, stress is higher among the low-income so smaller portions are a little more difficult to agree to (seeing as eating is a stress reliever and inducer), and exercise is nearly impossible for some low-income families who are working multiple jobs to just barely afford to get by.

I guess my entire point was to encourage the people who CAN do something about affordability to do it, because fair wages (no, I'm not a part of the Occupy movement who thinks nobody should have to contribute to society or whatever their stupid point is/was) could easily right that ship, leading to a healthier, happier public which leads to a healthier, happier economy.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Live Messenger Officially Converted to Skype

Messenger has moved to Skype

Messenger was retired in April 2013 and is no longer available or supported on most Mac and Windows operating systems. *

You can continue to make audio and video calls with your contacts on Skype and Facebook and send IMs for free—your contacts will come with you when you update to Skype and sign in with your Microsoft account.

Find out more about Skype

For information about moving from Messenger to Skype, visit the About Skype page.
To learn about instant messaging with Skype on your Windows desktop, visit the Skype instant messaging page.
To find out how to call your contacts with Skype on your Windows desktop, visit the Skype–to–Skype calling page.


I am disappointed by this. Microsoft has abandoned millions of customers worldwide in favor of their newly acquired toy, Skype. They flaunt it as a merger but the merging process is reported widespread to be faulty and does not transition your contact. They also have not yet ado…

You Must Be The Greatest!

"The irony was not lost on me: the man my trials had molded me into, was the master I'd spent all these years trying to find. I was lost and alone, awash with despair. I sought mentorship, I sought guidance- I'd fallen to my knees and begged for it. And now, there is no other way to say it, than to say I'd been blinded by suffering; I just could not see that my many struggles had been the hands sculpting me into the guide I'd sought. Where I once sought from others their forgiveness for my failures, I now forgive myself, and seek to help other extend the same to themselves. Where I once sought from my loved ones support for my dreams, I find now that they did not extend aid because they saw who I could be, and not who I was. I am my own master. Master, and servant - I am not above humanity, nor below it. I am of it, I am it. I am all that is human: life, death, love, loss, joy, and suffering. I am all of it, and because I am all of it, I am important, and necessar…

WWE Brand Split Mock Draft

So we're coming up very close to the brand split in the WWE, where RAW and Smackdown will be exclusive brands with exclusive rosters, and Smackdown will be going live every Tuesday.
Now, there are a number of factors that could shift the way the draft is handled. For example, we're still uncertain which show Shane and Stephanie will run. We're still unsure if they're certainly going to bring back the World Heavyweight Championship, or run with my idea and merge the IC/US titles and make that the main title on Smackdown. We're still not aware if tag teams will be split, if each show will have a unique division and title. We're still not sure if we're going to have women exclusive to each show and what that means for the Women's Championship.
Now, barring all surprise (not currently on the roster, and not NXT) draft choices, let us work with a few assumptions. First, I want to assume they will be bringing the World Heavyweight Championship back. I want t…